In their coverage of the invasion of Ukraine, many Italian TV talk shows continued to host commentators, journalists, and analysts who had positions very close to those of Russian President Vladimir Putin, and this continues to generate heated debate. This week, some members of the Oversight Committee of the Rai, the parliamentary body that controls the work of the public radio and television service, proposed a kind of joint investigation with Copasir, the parliamentary committee that controls the work of the secret services: it seems that if he does nothing, but in the next few days Both bodies are likely to hold a hearing with Carlo Fortez, Rai CEO.
The controversies surrounding the talk show guests are more relevant with respect to Rai, but they include all major networks, especially La7 and Rete 4. Part of them include Italian scientists and experts with controversial positions and who in general tend to defend the reasons for the Russian invasion and Putin: these include: Cases, for example, Alessandro Orsini, professor of sociology of terrorism who in the past month and a half has become very popular on television, is a regular guest on several schedules each week (especially White papers On Rai 3 and Cleaning Campaign On La7), writes regularly on Happening every dayand now he also holds a show called “Ukraine. Everything They Don’t Tell You”.
Several other scholars and experts have argued in critical television positions towards NATO and the West’s approach to war, with further arguments standing and without questioning that an aggressive war on the part of Russia against Ukraine is underway. Thinkers and analysts who have expressed positions generally attributed to pacifism are often described as “pro-Russian”, and attributed to alleged bad faith. This summary and hasty approach to managing different viewpoints has also sparked lively discussion on social networks and newspapers in recent weeks.
But in parallel with this kind of interference, in recent weeks there has also been a wide space on Italian television for people officially associated with Putin’s government, or who have obvious informal ties, and who have basically been able to expose their arguments. Russian propaganda.
– Read also: Do Italian talk shows provide information?
This is the case of Alexander Dugin, the far-right philosopher who is considered one of the ideologues of Putin’s Russia, interviewed by Rete 4. Right hand and back and then outside the corewho also had to participate in White papers before skipping the interview. Recently participated in White papers it’s half past eight On La7 Nadana Fridrikhson, journalist for Russian TV ZvidzaState-controlled, which repeated Putin’s propaganda narrative that invading Ukraine would be a process of “disarmament” and “disarmament”. A few days ago in white area, Rete 4 programme, hosted by Maria Zakharova, spokeswoman for the Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs. Still other cases involve guests who fought or worked as journalists in the breakaway republics of Donbass, and publicly supported the arguments of pro-Russian forces.
These interviews and these interventions provoked reactions from some politicians. Andrea Romano, a Democrat and a member of the oversight committee, suggested that Copasir be involved in a hearing scheduled next week with Fortes to talk about “the highly sensitive issue of the information transmitted and the quality of the discussions hosted.” “We want to understand if they are freely working Russian journalists or even Russian government officials who spread Kremlin propaganda,” said Italian deputy Viva Michele Anzaldi. Republic.
– Read also: Because Italy is very loyal to Russia
Since Kupasir also plans to speak with Fortes, a joint hearing was contemplated: but the head of the oversight body of the secret services, Adolfo Urso, of Fratelli d’Italia, had already said that he preferred two different meetings, such that Kubacer’s meetings were covered in secrecy.
Meanwhile, the Commission is currently discussing a resolution promoted by Alberto Paraccini of Forza Italia that would motivate Ray to favor free speeches on talk shows and favor rotating guests. Many renamed it the “Orsini Decision”, as it was conceived right after the controversy over the contract he proposed to him White papersAlready in the middle of a heated debate. However, members of the 5-Star Movement oppose the decision, officially because they believe it will favor competition from private networks. to me RepublicHowever, the opposition will also be linked to the alleged recent rapprochement between M5S leader Giuseppe Conte and Orsini.